-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 135
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proposal to transfer "cjs-module-lexer" repo into Node.js organization #557
Comments
+1 |
2 similar comments
+1 |
+1 |
This is approved. @guybedford can you make sure the repository have the following files?
If any of those files are missing, feel free to open a PR to add them and ping me to double check. We can transfer the repository afterwards. |
Sure will do. Just give me a few days to prepare the repo for the transfer. |
I hate to admit I still haven't got around to this work. Basically if someone would like to offer to do this repo setup for the transfer I would be glad to assist, but in the end I also don't feel like there's anything wrong with maintaining the repo locally for the time being too. Feel free to prod me anytime though on it. |
I've finally gone ahead and transferred the cjs-module-lexer project into the Node.js organization having completed the setup steps here. I've also added the Node.js foundation to the npm access for the package. |
Once the PR at nodejs/node#35249 lands, Node.js will have a dependency on the external project https://github.com/guybedford/cjs-module-lexer, which was created and will be maintained explicitly for this PR feature.
I expect to maintain this project for at least a few years, but that maintenance would be done always based on upstreaming. In addition there would be no plans to add features that would not be included in the Node.js implementation.
To enable all Node.js collaborators to be able to equally contribute to this repo I would like to propose transferring the repo into the Node.js organization. I would continue to be the primary developer on that project, but it would be a clearer distinction than it being some arbitrary third party project without any direct involvement.
The primary roadmap I see for the project is:
It would be great to hear what others think of this or if there are other suggestions for handling the process between these projects.
//cc @targos
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: