Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 1, 2019. It is now read-only.

Working Together - Introducing nodejs/collaboration #135

Closed
snostorm opened this issue Aug 11, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

Working Together - Introducing nodejs/collaboration #135

snostorm opened this issue Aug 11, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@snostorm
Copy link

As a heads up for those of you who weren't able to make the summit, https://github.com/nodejs/collaboration has been spun up as a new team to help share resources and best practices among groups, as well as trying to help everyone better work together.

Later we'll be more aggressively working to get representation from all WGs but for now I was hoping to get a few evangelism members in early. Because this group by its very nature has to stay in tune with what the other WG are doing (for weekly updates, tweets, etc.) collaboration is a key factor for your team's success.

Another aspect of this early invite is to try and develop better ways to have evangelism, website, documentation and the 30+ i18n groups work together. We're hoping on some occasional meetings (say, a few times a year) across many time zones and to generally maintain open channels in between. For that see #134 or nodejs/Intl#9.

So if you are interested, we'd love to get some early input and also longterm have some ongoing representation from your team as members inside the new group.

@yosuke-furukawa
Copy link
Member

@snostorm Yes, I would like to collaborate together !! if anyone does not stand as a representation, I would like to try to get involved to the WG.

@snostorm
Copy link
Author

@yosuke-furukawa there's room for multiple people to join the Collaboration Team from the same WG. If you're interested, join via https://github.com/orgs/nodejs/teams/collaboration :)

@bnb
Copy link
Contributor

bnb commented Sep 1, 2016

@Trott Do you know the status on this? Looks like there's been 0 activity in Collaboration.

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Sep 2, 2016

I don't have any special knowledge about it, but as far as I know, any Collaboration WG or similar initiative is inactive. I'll go ahead and close this. If that's a mistake and this is really a going concern, some can comment and/or re-open.

@Trott Trott closed this as completed Sep 2, 2016
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants