Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Political neutrality in i18n repo names #1360

Closed
TimothyGu opened this issue Apr 7, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

Political neutrality in i18n repo names #1360

TimothyGu opened this issue Apr 7, 2015 · 4 comments
Labels
meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project.

Comments

@TimothyGu
Copy link
Member

Hi all, first issue filed here.

I noticed that some i18n repo names, like iojs-tw and iojs-cn, are rather arbitrary and do not follow any existing standards. As an i18n repo, one the language should be specified and not the country in which it is most widely spoken.

For example, Singapore and Malaysia, not exactly related to China politically, use simplified characters more than otherwise. Therefore iojs-cn should be used.

Hong Kong and Macau, territories under control of the PRC, use traditional characters, and iojs-tw is more applicable to them.

In order to solve this problem, I propose to use more neutral terms, like zh-Hans and zh-Hant, both which are standardized by RFC-5646.

@TimothyGu
Copy link
Member Author

Note that the description of the repos are both country-neutral already, just the repo names.

@mikeal
Copy link
Contributor

mikeal commented Apr 7, 2015

When I first set them up I was pulling the suffixes from the first language -> suffix map I could find. Since then some of them have changed their name (jp became ja for instance).

Every language community is autonomous so if they want to change their name they are free to do so. Ping me in any issue where this has been decided and I'm more than happy to do the rename.

@Fishrock123 Fishrock123 added the meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project. label Apr 7, 2015
@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

Some of the groups (including iojs-cn) are amalgamated and control related localizations.

I.e. iojs-cn does both traditional and simplified chinese, iirc. If this is an issue, it is probably best to bring up in one of those repos.

@TimothyGu
Copy link
Member Author

@Fishrock123 thanks for the explanation!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants