-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Node 6 uses full CPU core #6459
Comments
You should probably try asking at https://github.com/webpack/webpack-dev-server rather than here, if that specific application is affected. |
Sounds like a duplicate of #6416 |
@Fishrock123 That sounds very unlikely, among other things because that other issue is actually rather about infinite recursion than about an infinite loop and throws an |
@alejandroiglesias Can you peek into the process to see what it's doing (e.g. using strace or even trying to attach to the node debugger if possible)? |
I'm seeing the same thing. Not using dev server but I am using web pack and karma. Any thing that continues execution in a watch mode takes a full core: karma start, web pack -w and web storm's integration with karma. Just wanted to add detail to this issue. |
same issue when use v6 && webpack -w |
Has anyone reported this to webpack yet? We can't do much without a minimal test case. If it requires installing all of webpack, I doubt anyone is going to look at it. |
IIRC, both Karma and Webpack use Chokidar under the hood, so this might be paulmillr/chokidar#447 |
We observed the same issue with a meteor-application (not using webpack). On node4, cpu is low, on node6 always 100% (but in io-wait or similar) |
|
I'll go ahead and close this then. It doesn't appear to be an issue with node.js core. |
so, it is caused by |
Node process starts using a 100% CPU core after updating from 5.10.1 to version 6. Not sure what other details to give other that I ran
npm start
on my project which runs the following command:webpack-dev-server --port 4444 --hot --inline --progress --colors
. I have the same running at 0.0 CPU usage right now with version 5.10.1.If you need more information, please let me know.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: