Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RC4 deprecation #844

Closed
silverwind opened this issue Feb 14, 2015 · 6 comments
Closed

RC4 deprecation #844

silverwind opened this issue Feb 14, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@silverwind
Copy link
Contributor

I think this warrants an issue of its own, as #826 got a bit lengthy.

Current best practices dictate

Implementations MUST NOT negotiate RC4 cipher suites.

I agree with that, but I'm not sure how this would fit into the semver picture, as it's not really an API change itself, but still has the possibilty of breaking connectivity of naive implementations that use the default cipher suite (when the other end of the connection is ancient). Further, the issue is complicated because apparently, our TLS client's ciphers option was never documented.

Semver says, we can issue deprecation warnings in a semver-minor, and I think the best course of action would be to document the pending RC4 removal in the release notes and the docs, and finally remove the cipher in 2.0.0. Does this sound reasonable?

@silverwind
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also to note: RC4 will not be entirely deprecated unless OpenSSL drops support for it. It just won't be available for negotiation using the default settings.

@silverwind
Copy link
Contributor Author

Maybe I'm blowing this a bit out of proportion, but I think the removal of RC4 from the default ciphers should happen in a semver-minor at least.

@indutny
Copy link
Member

indutny commented Feb 14, 2015

I suggest it to be semver-minor.

@silverwind
Copy link
Contributor Author

Alright, semver-minor be it then.

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

Does this mean #826 is semver-minor?

@silverwind
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, please tag it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants