-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
deps: V8: cherry-pick 0dfd9ea51241 #30713
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Original commit message: [coverage] Fix coverage with default arguments In the presence of default arguments, the body of the function gets wrapped into another block. This caused our trailing-range-after-return optimization to not apply, because the wrapper block had no source range assigned. This CL correctly assignes a source range to that block, which allows already present code to handle it correctly. Note that this is not a real coverage bug; we've just been reporting whitespace as uncovered. We're fixing it for consistency. Originally reported on github.com/bcoe/c8/issues/66 Bug: v8:9952 Change-Id: Iab3905f558eb99126e0dad8072d03d0a312fdcd3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1903430 Commit-Queue: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64836} Refs: v8/v8@0dfd9ea
321456f
to
0c43319
Compare
@addaleax it looks like the pertinent V8 tests ( I would like to fast-track landing this patch, while I have some cycles today. 👍 or 👎 |
Original commit message: [coverage] Fix coverage with default arguments In the presence of default arguments, the body of the function gets wrapped into another block. This caused our trailing-range-after-return optimization to not apply, because the wrapper block had no source range assigned. This CL correctly assignes a source range to that block, which allows already present code to handle it correctly. Note that this is not a real coverage bug; we've just been reporting whitespace as uncovered. We're fixing it for consistency. Originally reported on github.com/bcoe/c8/issues/66 Bug: v8:9952 Change-Id: Iab3905f558eb99126e0dad8072d03d0a312fdcd3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1903430 Commit-Queue: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64836} Refs: v8/v8@0dfd9ea PR-URL: #30713 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Landed in 5961161 |
Original commit message: [coverage] Fix coverage with default arguments In the presence of default arguments, the body of the function gets wrapped into another block. This caused our trailing-range-after-return optimization to not apply, because the wrapper block had no source range assigned. This CL correctly assignes a source range to that block, which allows already present code to handle it correctly. Note that this is not a real coverage bug; we've just been reporting whitespace as uncovered. We're fixing it for consistency. Originally reported on github.com/bcoe/c8/issues/66 Bug: v8:9952 Change-Id: Iab3905f558eb99126e0dad8072d03d0a312fdcd3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1903430 Commit-Queue: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64836} Refs: v8/v8@0dfd9ea PR-URL: #30713 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Should this be backported to |
@targos ideally we'd backport this, sounds like I should go through that guide? |
Original commit message:
Refs: v8/v8@0dfd9ea
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passesThis addresses: bcoe/c8#66, bcoe/c8#151