Website Admin WG Elections

[mikeal]

Now that the WG is quite large it's time to elect the admin group.

I'd like to nominate the top 4 contributors (based on GitHub "contributions" tab):

• @fhemberger
• @mikeal
• @rvagg
• @phillipj

Now, this is solely based on this repo so if this misses people who have been engaged in building a lot of the content on the other resources that were migrated please nominate additional people to the group.

Nearly all work in this repo is accomplished without the admin group, the Website WG creates and merges most content. The admin group only resolves disputes and has the right to merge their own work (usually for administrative purposes). For more info https://github.com/nodejs/new.nodejs.org/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md

[phillipj]

I'd be more than happy to join! :) I'll definitely be watching and contributing going forward, although I cant promise to be just as responsive, as I've had more spare time than usual the last two months.

[Trott]

Is there a lot of docs stuff that's going to move to this repo? Might it make sense to consider a docs representative? @chrisdickinson or someone else in that WG?

[bnb]

+1 to all those. Also, I think @therebelrobot has demonstrated that he is capable of aiding in the type of decisions that the Admin group would be making.

[mikeal]

Ah yes, @therebelrobot is a contributor who contributed heavily to prior repositories and didn't show up in the top list for this repo. Any objections to @therebelrobot being added to the Admin WG?

[bnb]

We should set a time frame for this, so we can roll it out. Close and add proposed admins (with support) on Friday? Or sooner?

[rvagg]

fwiw I only want to be able to have the ability to merge my stuff for releases, other than that I'd go through the standard process and prefer more active WG members to merge my PRs

[phillipj]

Is there still need for an admin group, if so are we waiting for more supporting votes or is it good to go?

[mikeal]

Closing, we got this in. if you want to nominate anyone else please create a new PR.