Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Positioning of Grantha nukta inconsistent #2

Open
dscorbett opened this issue Apr 8, 2020 · 9 comments
Open

Positioning of Grantha nukta inconsistent #2

dscorbett opened this issue Apr 8, 2020 · 9 comments

Comments

@dscorbett
Copy link

Font

NotoSerifTamil-Regular.otf
NotoSerifTamilSlanted-Regular.otf

Where the font came from, and when

Site: https://github.com/googlefonts/noto-fonts/blob/115d38430d957d38307457c036302b7bdbe0bbc4/phaseIII_only/unhinted/otf/NotoSerifTamil/NotoSerifTamil-Regular.otf
Site: https://github.com/googlefonts/noto-fonts/blob/115d38430d957d38307457c036302b7bdbe0bbc4/phaseIII_only/unhinted/otf/NotoSerifTamilSlanted/NotoSerifTamilSlanted-Regular.otf
Date: 2020-04-08

Font version

Version 2.000

Issue

U+1133C GRANTHA SIGN NUKTA blocks ligatures. Noto Sans Tamil gets it right.

Character data

க𑌼ுகு
U+0B95 TAMIL LETTER KA
U+1133C GRANTHA SIGN NUKTA
U+0BC1 TAMIL VOWEL SIGN U
U+0B95 TAMIL LETTER KA
U+0BC1 TAMIL VOWEL SIGN U

Screenshot

க𑌼ுகு
க𑌼ுகு

@punchcutter
Copy link

@marekjez86 This is for the Tamil fonts so should be labeled Script-Tamil

@nizarsq
Copy link

nizarsq commented Jun 23, 2020

@dscorbett for some reason I'm getting a different behavior. Apparently, U+0B95 TAMIL LETTER KA shape stay the same when followed by U+1133C GRANTHA SIGN NUKTA, but U+1133C GRANTHA SIGN NUKTA placement is different in NotoSansTamil. I'm not language/script expert and I might be missing something here. Attaching a screenshot of the result I got and the test case.
Screen Shot 2020-06-22 at 10 55 38 PM
Screen Shot 2020-06-22 at 10 56 03 PM

@dscorbett
Copy link
Author

I’m now getting the same behavior you are. It must have been fixed in version 2.001. I don’t know whether the position of the dots inside or outside the curve matters.

@nizarsq
Copy link

nizarsq commented Jun 23, 2020

I believe dots position should be consistent. Maybe language/script opinion will be a good option. @marekjez86 what do you think?

@simoncozens simoncozens transferred this issue from notofonts/noto-fonts Jun 21, 2022
@simoncozens
Copy link
Contributor

@virtualvinodh, could you give an opinion on where Grantha nuktas should go on Tamil glyphs? (Or if it matters?)

shape
shape

@simoncozens simoncozens changed the title U+1133C GRANTHA SIGN NUKTA blocks Tamil ligatures Positioning of Grantha nukta inconsistent Mar 17, 2023
@virtualvinodh
Copy link

Personally, I have never used Nuktas with Tamil letters.

If I were to use one, I would go for the second image. Looks more natural.

V

@simoncozens
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks!

@jamadagni
Copy link

I agree with @virtualvinodh that it would be simpler, cleaner and more consistent to keep the nukta below the consonant+vowel ligature, but it is possible that it was done due to line spacing considerations? Normally Tamil is a vertically very compact but horizontally more space-using script, so please check that before making any changes.

@jamadagni
Copy link

FWIW I should note that the OP shows the consonant+vowel ligature broken by the nukta. Please ensure that it is not broken so. What is shown by @simoncozens in the last image above is correct.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants