Replies: 1 comment
-
Unfortunately, no. You can try to fork some previous version where it was generating just and extension with this function. As for now it is replaced with this proxy class which is more superior in terms of number of use cases it covers. Are there any particular problems with the current approach that are avoidable by having a plain extension |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Is there currently a way to generate a raw form of a
copyWith
method without the whole proxy business?For example:
Thanks.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions