Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a discussions list on this GitHub repo? #947

Open
raducoravu opened this issue Nov 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Add a discussions list on this GitHub repo? #947

raducoravu opened this issue Nov 25, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@raducoravu
Copy link

I recently obtained some feedback from someone (new DITA XML user, converting DocBook to DITA XML) who started a new project and decided to use DITA 2.0 for it, I tried to send it to "dita-comment@lists.oasis-open.org" but the email does not work anymore. Maybe you could enable discussions on this repo:

https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/enabling-features-for-your-repository/enabling-or-disabling-github-discussions-for-a-repository

Pasting also the user's feedback below:

Like I mentioned, I’ve been learning DITA as I go. I saw that DITA 2.0 added built-in elements for documenting hardware, plus the emphasis domain elements, that would be useful for me, and I did not realize how slowly DITA 2.0 was progressing. I’m afraid at this point I’ve already written about 200 topics for a different product in DITA 2.0, in addition to the content I just converted from DocBook.

I suspect I’m a fairly surface-level DITA user, so if I do run into major issues during publishing, converting back to 1.3 may primarily be a matter of mapping <hwcontrol> to <uicontrol> and nested <steps> to <substeps>. 
@raducoravu raducoravu changed the title Add a discussions list on the "dita" GitHub project? Add a discussions list on this GitHub repo? Nov 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant