Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Figure 1 Issuer-Holder-Verifier Model should be modified #285

Open
Denisthemalice opened this issue Dec 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Figure 1 Issuer-Holder-Verifier Model should be modified #285

Denisthemalice opened this issue Dec 7, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@Denisthemalice
Copy link


            +------------+
            |            |
            |   Issuer   |
            |            |
            +------------+
                  |
         Issues Digital Credentials
         and All Disclosures when 
    selectively disclosure is supported
                  |
                  v
            +------------+
            |            |
            |   Holder   |<---- Subject
            |            |
            +------------+
                  |
  Presents Digital Credential + Selected Disclosures
     when selectively disclosure is supported
       + optional Key Binding Token
                  |
                  v
            +-------------+
            |             |+                              +------------+
            |  Verifiers  ||+ ----- optional use -------> |   Status   |
            |             |||  of Token Status Lists      |  Provider  |
            +-------------+||  to retrieve the status     |            |
             +-------------+|  of the Digital Credential  +------------+
              +-------------+

Note that the wording:

optionally retrieve status of Verifiable Credential

has been replaced by:

optional use of Token Status Lists to retrieve the status of the Digital Credential

This change is important as the current wording may let think that a Status provider is necessarily needed to know the status of a Digital Credential, whereas it is not the case.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant