-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
replace metazoan-specific relationships on generic caro-equivalent structures with taxon GCIs #2348
Comments
I am annotating output with actions proposed: [Term] [Term] [Term] [Term] [Term] [Term] [Term] [Term] [Term] [Term] [Term] [Term] [Term] [Term] [Term] [Term] [Term] [Term] [Term] [Term] [Term] [Term] [Term] [Term] [Term] |
@cmungall what taxon for |
There are a broader set of issues I will link to later about whether or not it is a good idea to have
uberon:anatomical_structure = caro:anatomical_structure and part-of some metazoa
for now people are using the uberon classes as if they were more general. Issues arise from this e.g. with starts-and-ends to zygote for anatomical structure where anatomical structure is pan-cellular organisms.
Let's replace this with taxon GCIs while we figure out what the longer term solution is
Note that @fbastian relies on the stages, even for generic terms I believe. But the stages will 'come back' in the composite-metazoan release
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: