You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi! Thank you for this library. Notebook replicating this issue is at this link. I was just using the areaY mark and found that when using null values in the data to signify cutoffs between rendered regions, that the area includes two extraneous points that should have been filtered out. The resulting shape is trapezoidal rather than rectangular. It's hard to notice when data density is high but visible otherwise. One workaround is by specifying both y1 and y2, and including nulls in both when necessary.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This allows for example this test to work, by making an area show something for isolated dates. It's also explicitly test in integerIntervalAreaZ (#1775).
A different way to address this would be to use a filter transform:
Hi! Thank you for this library. Notebook replicating this issue is at this link. I was just using the areaY mark and found that when using null values in the data to signify cutoffs between rendered regions, that the area includes two extraneous points that should have been filtered out. The resulting shape is trapezoidal rather than rectangular. It's hard to notice when data density is high but visible otherwise. One workaround is by specifying both y1 and y2, and including nulls in both when necessary.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: