You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current semantics of opam switch is not very clear.
A possible improvement could be:
$ opam switch -add jane-elisp -alias-of 4.00.0
$ opam switch -add 4.00.0 # here -alias-of 4.00.0 is implicit as alias and compiler have the same name)
$ opam switch jane-elisp
$ opam switch -rm jane-elisp
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
we can rename opam switch to opam ocaml or opam compiler...
for @lefessan : If we want to work with two different OCaml at the same time in two terminal, we could propose : opam --ocaml alias1 <subcommand>, opam --ocaml alias2 <subcommand>.
The locking will then move under .opam/alias instead of the current .opam.
I quite like @Cago proposition (and I would prefer keeping opam switch). @tuong, good idea, opam --alias <foo> <subcommand> could also help fixing #66.
The current semantics of
opam switch
is not very clear.A possible improvement could be:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: