-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Run global UnWW3 to provide boundary to Atlantic set up #9
Comments
To do:
|
https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-single-levels?tab=form |
See meeting notes here: oceanmodeling/ufs-weather-model#83 |
@yunfangsun you've run this and generated a boundary condition, correct? The next step is to verify that the BC you created is correct? Can you add some info here:
|
Hi @aliabdolali , I have used your global wave model configuration and run a simulation, when I generate the whole filed by using ww3_ounf.inp vi ww3_ounf.inp
It only generate one time step of results
and the ww3_ounp.inp could give me the correct outputs, could you please suggest me what I should modify in Thank you! |
from what you pasted here, I see 45 time steps in the netcdf file. you can see those time steps if you try: ncdump -tv time ww3.202209_hs.nc |
but``` // global attributes: time = "2022-09-15", "2022-09-15 01", "2022-09-15 02", "2022-09-15 03",
|
please attach ww3_shel.inp(nml) and ww3_ounf.inp(nml) here |
ww3.shel.nml
ww3_ounf.inp
|
change $ 20220901 000000 10800 999 to $ 20220901 000000 3600 9999 in ounf.nml |
in case you did not fix it, send me an invite and we can take a look at your log.ww3 and see what's wrong there |
Hi @aliabdolali |
It shouldn't, it is either a bug or some hidden character. That is why we switched to nml at ERDC |
For this week, I will try to set up to use the spectra from the outputs of the global wave model as open boundary conditions to drive the Atlantic domain with the coarse-resolution SCHISM mesh. |
awesome, keep up posted on your progress or if you faced an issue. |
https://github.com/noaa-ocs-modeling/SurgeTeamCoordination/issues/431
...continue documenting this task here
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: