You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Assuming kW as the base unit for flows, means, that at least 9 kWh have to go through that flow. For short time horizons, that can be a low number, for time horizons lower than 4.5 h, the problem becomes infeasible. In my opinion, we should replace this by a minimum and maximum average load, respectively.
Currently, we have parameters
full_load_time_min
andfull_load_time_max
, respectively.Assuming kW as the base unit for flows, means, that at least 9 kWh have to go through that flow. For short time horizons, that can be a low number, for time horizons lower than 4.5 h, the problem becomes infeasible. In my opinion, we should replace this by a minimum and maximum average load, respectively.
This would mean 18/4 = 4.5 full load hours for a time horizon of 18 hours but 8760/4 = 2190 full load hours if a full year is optimised.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: