Consider to rename this to opentelemetry-specs?

[bogdandrutu]

Pros: Shorter

[iredelmeier]

Alternatively, just specification?

[bogdandrutu]

We had this argument before, if the name is too generic when people fork this repo will not make sense inside their account.

[iredelmeier]

@bogdandrutu mind linking that discussion in here?

[bogdandrutu]

/cc @yurishkuro

[austinlparker]

my 0.02 is that opentelemetry-specification is more explicit and preferable. additionally, it's a word that's highly unlikely to ever be overloaded (unlike the word spec/s, which could be used as a language or library name - i would point to spec# or the spec package in npm as examples of this.) not to say no one would ever name a language/package specification`, but it feels a bit more reserved.

[yurishkuro]

My preference, in the decreasing order:

1. close this issue as bikeshedding
2. specification
3. opentelemetry-specification

[austinlparker]

Closing as bikeshedding.