Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ReportingPoint suggestion, links to airspace zones. #281

Open
baltazar67 opened this issue Feb 28, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

ReportingPoint suggestion, links to airspace zones. #281

baltazar67 opened this issue Feb 28, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
considered A considered feature. May or may not be implemented.

Comments

@baltazar67
Copy link

Hello Stephan,

thank you for your swift resolution of suspicious coordinates in reporting point database.
One question/suggestion, if it is not too much :)

Why did you amend the reporting point name with a few letters of the airfied name?

For example: The MS1 VFR reporting point that belongs to Maribor (LJMB) airfield is designated as MS1MA. A similar point ME1 (which also belongs to Maribor), is designated as ME1PT probably because of vicinity of Ptuj LJPT airfield near by, but in fact it does not belong to this airfield. It belongs to the Maribor TMA (airfield).

However, the json structure of the reporting point has a proper format:

It has a "name" field, which should hold the original designations like "MS1" from the example above,
it has "airports" array which (according to my understanding) are "_id"s of airfields that the reporting point belongs to.

So, to interpret this name, one can always use airfield links to amend the reporting point name if this is deemed necessary.

--

VFR points do not necessary always belong to airfields. They could also belong to some control zone. A typical example are FIR crossing/border points. In most cases they are also mandatory points. The points are usually IFR names at FIR borders.

For this reason, I believe that it would be beneficial to add "zones" or "airspaces" array to json, where one could link appropriate zones in parallel to airfields.

Best regards,

Aleš

@reskume reskume self-assigned this Mar 21, 2023
@reskume reskume added the considered A considered feature. May or may not be implemented. label Mar 21, 2023
@reskume reskume added enhancement New feature or request considered A considered feature. May or may not be implemented. and removed considered A considered feature. May or may not be implemented. enhancement New feature or request labels Jun 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
considered A considered feature. May or may not be implemented.
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants