Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Auto-ingest airspace data for FR (France) #285

Open
reskume opened this issue Mar 8, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Auto-ingest airspace data for FR (France) #285

reskume opened this issue Mar 8, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@reskume
Copy link
Contributor

reskume commented Mar 8, 2023

No description provided.

@reskume reskume added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 8, 2023
@reskume reskume self-assigned this Mar 8, 2023
@reskume reskume moved this from Review to Scheduled in continuous-release Mar 8, 2023
@reskume reskume moved this from Scheduled to Accepted in continuous-release Mar 8, 2023
@reskume
Copy link
Contributor Author

reskume commented Mar 27, 2023

Not yet implemented. Source must provide OpenAIR extended format before automated data ingestion can be implemented.

@reskume reskume moved this from Accepted to Scheduled in continuous-release May 2, 2023
@reskume reskume moved this from Scheduled to Accepted in continuous-release Jun 29, 2023
@llauner
Copy link

llauner commented Apr 2, 2024

Hi @reskume
https://github.com/planeur-net/airspace
Is now providing OpenAIR extended format.
Direct access to the file is here: https://planeur-net.github.io/airspace/france.txt

The file is also including the bird protection areas (updated every month).

Could you give details on your plans to auto-ingest data from this file ?
Thanks

@reskume
Copy link
Contributor Author

reskume commented Apr 4, 2024

Hi @llauner

the plans to auto-ingest the repo are still oon our todo-list - and I would love to do that! Last time the missing extended format was a showstopper. With this out of the way, I can have another try. But one thing still remains a pain. There are overlapping airspaces that, afair and please correct me if I'm wrong, are actually not part of the French airspace: for example area near Bale, Geneva. Is this still the case? I know it is no problem if the file is used in "isolation" and is the only one on a flight computer. But the time it is integrated into a bigger dataset that also contains the neighbor airspaces, it gets messy real quick.

If those airspaces still exist in the file, I could think of some possible ways to handle this:

  • easiest one: remove non-french airspaces. But this ma be no options since it will reduce UX for people that solely use this airspace file.
  • move non-french airspaces to the bottom of the file so that a tool can drop this section of the file when reading it.
  • tag each airspace somehow (instead of moving them to the bottom) so that the tool can drop it

Can you think of some other ways to achieve this? Or maybe it isn't even necessary at all...

Cheers,

Stephan

@llauner
Copy link

llauner commented Apr 4, 2024

I'll look at the file and see about the overlapping airspaces...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants