Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vote agreement needs to consider absolute, not just relative, vote comparisons #1444

Closed
wisdomtooth opened this issue Sep 19, 2022 · 6 comments
Labels

Comments

@wisdomtooth
Copy link

wisdomtooth commented Sep 19, 2022

Vote agreement is currently ranked by the percentage of equal votes in which two politicians voted. That is ranking agreement between politicians that have voted the same on the 5 bills they both voted on higher than between politicians that have voted the same 49 out of 50 votes they both participated in. A column with the total number of agreed votes should be included so that site users can see what the percentage is of. A further enhancement could involve an agreement score based on both the percentage and number of agreed votes. If you, for instance, use cosine similarity coefficient—simply subtracting opposite votes from agreed votes, and dividing by the geometric mean of total votes from each politician—you'll not only have a score that is discounted for low coattendence, but also produces negative scores when politicians disagree on most votes.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Mar 21, 2023

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because there has been no activity on it for about six months. If you want to keep it open please make a comment and explain why this issue is still relevant. Otherwise it will be automatically closed in a week. Thank you!

@stale stale bot added the wontfix label Mar 21, 2023
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Mar 28, 2023
@katska
Copy link
Contributor

katska commented Apr 11, 2023

this is still a worthy issue

@katska katska reopened this Apr 11, 2023
@stale stale bot removed the wontfix label Apr 11, 2023
@wisdomtooth
Copy link
Author

this is still a worthy issue

Thanks for reopening it, @katska. I've just revisited this ticket, and can barely understand what I wrote 😅

I remember what the issue is, but perhaps you could add to it formulating it from your own pov.

Thanks again.

Copy link

stale bot commented Feb 20, 2024

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because there has been no activity on it for about six months. If you want to keep it open please make a comment and explain why this issue is still relevant. Otherwise it will be automatically closed in a week. Thank you!

@stale stale bot added the wontfix label Feb 20, 2024
@katska katska removed the wontfix label Feb 20, 2024
@katska
Copy link
Contributor

katska commented Feb 20, 2024

@wisdomtooth I'm not actively looking at this until such time as there's potential to review and add nuance to how these relationships are represented. If you have thoughts in the meantime, or next time the bot reminds us to keep this open please chime in!

Copy link

stale bot commented Aug 18, 2024

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because there has been no activity on it for about six months. If you want to keep it open please make a comment and explain why this issue is still relevant. Otherwise it will be automatically closed in a week. Thank you!

@stale stale bot added the wontfix label Aug 18, 2024
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Aug 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants