[PRE REVIEW]: From Maps to Models - Tutorials for structural geological modeling using GemPy and GemGIS

[whedon]

Submitting author: @AlexanderJuestel (Alexander Jüstel)
Repository: https://github.com/cgre-aachen/gemgis_data
Version: v.1.0.0
Editor: @acocac
Reviewers: @BenjMy, @jwagemann
Managing EiC: Jordan Gorzalski

⚠️ JOSE reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSE is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/5e6ad1eedf43a1175c41e188b2881941"><img src="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/5e6ad1eedf43a1175c41e188b2881941/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/5e6ad1eedf43a1175c41e188b2881941/status.svg)](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/5e6ad1eedf43a1175c41e188b2881941)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSE @AlexanderJuestel. Currently, there isn't an JOSE editor assigned to your paper.

@AlexanderJuestel if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSE and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSE submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSE reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSE is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Wordcount for paper.md is 2280

[whedon]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.5281/zenodo.4569086 is OK
- 10.5194/gmd-12-1-2019 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01450 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.4572994 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK
- 10.1016/j.pepi.2008.06.013 is OK
- 10.1007/978-94-011-2556-7_11 is OK
- 10.1130/GES02455.1 is OK
- 10.1007/BF02775087 is OK
- 10.1007/978-1-4615-9630-1 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.03709 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.81 s (83.8 files/s, 137751.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jupyter Notebook                49              0         105485           5289
Markdown                         7            107              0            268
QML                              1              3              0            240
XML                              8              0              0            221
TeX                              1             14              0            168
YAML                             2              5              6             34
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            68            129         105491           6220
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '8036508bc786e23e79e15049' was
gathered on 2022/07/09.
No commited files with the specified extensions were found.

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[AlexanderJuestel]

@jgorzalski, how may I be of assistance for the review?

[jgorzalski]

Hi @AlexanderJuestel 👋 If you could please take a look at the list of reviewers and see if you have any suggestions that would be great! Thank you!

[AlexanderJuestel]

Dear @jgorzalski,

I would start with sharondenisse as her preferred programming language is Python and her Topic Areas include Geology
Secondly, I would go with jwagemann as her preferred programming language is also Python and her Topic Areas include Geospatial Data Analysis.

Cheers
Alex

[AlexanderJuestel]

@jgorzalski, I suggested some reviewers, maybe we can continue the procedure once you have time :)

Cheers Alex

[AlexanderJuestel]

@jgorzalski just wanted to check in when we can proceed with the Pre-Review?

Cheers Alex

[labarba]

@whedon invite @ShanEllis as editor

[whedon]

@ShanEllis has been invited to edit this submission.

[ShanEllis]

Hi! Thanks for thinking of me, but I'm currently on parental leave and won't be able to get this done.

[labarba]

Oops. Looks like I missed this fact, or confused it somehow with Tiffany, who is also on parental leave!

[AlexanderJuestel]

@labarba maybe you know someone else who could become the editor for our submission? :)

[labarba]

hi @AlexanderJuestel — we are operating on a reduced mode at JOSE, with post-pandemic burnout compounding with summer holidays and two editors on parental leave right now. We have plans to recruit more editors soon, but for now you have to be patient. I will in charge of assigning an editor, but it may not be as fast as you would like.

[AlexanderJuestel]

All good, just wanted to check in :)

[AlexanderJuestel]

Hey @labarba,

just wanting to inquire if you have a rough schedule on how we proceed with the submission.

No hurry from my side though.

Cheers
Alex

[labarba]

Hi @AlexanderJuestel — I cannot give you a schedule right now. The good news is that JOSE had a campaign to recruit new editors, and we have 7 editors joining the board as we speak! (They are being onboarded this week, and their profiles has already been posted to our website.) Thank you for your patience.

[acocac]

@labarba, happy to take this one on.

[labarba]

Thank you, @acocac ! I will assign you now.

[labarba]

@whedon assign @acocac as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @acocac

[acocac]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[acocac]

Hi @sharondenisse — you volunteered to review for JOSE (The Journal of Open Source Education). Could you take a look at this submission and let us know if you might be able to volunteer a review for us? Thanks! 🙏
Title: "From Maps to Models - Tutorials for structural geological modeling using GemPy and GemGIS"
View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[acocac]

@AlexanderJuestel, thanks for the submission. It looks in line with the scope of JOSE. Note I've already asked to suggested reviewers their availability. I'll try to reach them via e-mail too.

[jwagemann]

Hi @acocac ,
happy to function as reviewer for this submission. Will try to review it in the course of the next two weeks.
Julia

[acocac]

Hello @jwagemann, thanks for confirming your availability! I'm waiting the response of the second suggested reviewer. Hope to confirm here when we start the Review Process soon!

[acocac]

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List all of Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# Assign a GitHub user as the sole reviewer of this submission
@whedon assign @username as reviewer

# Add a GitHub user to the reviewers of this submission
@whedon add @username as reviewer

# Re-invite a reviewer (if they can't update checklists)
@whedon re-invite @username as reviewer

# Remove a GitHub user from the reviewers of this submission
@whedon remove @username as reviewer

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

# Change editorial assignment
@whedon assign @username as editor

# Set the software archive DOI at the top of the issue e.g.
@whedon set 10.0000/zenodo.00000 as archive

# Set the software version at the top of the issue e.g.
@whedon set v1.0.1 as version

# Open the review issue
@whedon start review

EDITORIAL TASKS

# All commands can be run on a non-default branch, to do this pass a custom 
# branch name by following the command with `from branch custom-branch-name`.
# For example:

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

# Compile the paper from alternative branch
@whedon generate pdf from branch custom-branch-name

# Remind an author or reviewer to return to a review after a
# certain period of time (supported units days and weeks)
@whedon remind @reviewer in 2 weeks

# Ask Whedon to do a dry run of accepting the paper and depositing with Crossref
@whedon recommend-accept

# Ask Whedon to check the references for missing DOIs
@whedon check references

# Ask Whedon to check repository statistics for the submitted software
@whedon check repository

EiC TASKS

# Invite an editor to edit a submission (sending them an email)
@whedon invite @editor as editor

# Reject a paper
@whedon reject

# Withdraw a paper
@whedon withdraw

# Ask Whedon to actually accept the paper and deposit with Crossref
@whedon accept deposit=true

[acocac]

@whedon assign @jwagemann as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @jwagemann is now a reviewer

[acocac]

Hi @BenjMy — you volunteered to review for JOSE (The Journal of Open Source Education). Could you take a look at this submission and let us know if you might be able to volunteer a review for us (with a flexible deadline of mid-Jan 2023)?
Thanks! 🙏
Title: "From Maps to Models - Tutorials for structural geological modeling using GemPy and GemGIS" View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[BenjMy]

Hi @acocac ,
Happy to review this submission.

[acocac]

@whedon assign @BenjMy as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @BenjMy is now a reviewer

[acocac]

@whedon add @jwagemann as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @jwagemann is now a reviewer

[labarba]

Thank you, all — your contributions are greatly appreciated, and make this adventure in scholarly publication possible! 🙏

[acocac]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #185.