Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: lightr: import spectral data and metadata in R #1854

Closed
whedon opened this issue Nov 1, 2019 · 10 comments
Closed

[PRE REVIEW]: lightr: import spectral data and metadata in R #1854

whedon opened this issue Nov 1, 2019 · 10 comments
Assignees
Labels
pre-review R rOpenSci Submissions associated with rOpenSci TeX

Comments

@whedon
Copy link

whedon commented Nov 1, 2019

Submitting author: @Bisaloo (Hugo Gruson)
Repository: https://www.github.com/ropensci/lightr
Version: v0.1
Editor: @danielskatz
Reviewers: @danielskatz

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @Bisaloo. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@Bisaloo if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Nov 1, 2019

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience 😸

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Nov 1, 2019

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Nov 1, 2019

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
Copy link
Member

Note: This package has been peer-reviewed by rOpenSci (v. 0.1): ropensci/software-review#267

@danielskatz
Copy link

@whedon assign @danielskatz as editor

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Nov 1, 2019

OK, the editor is @danielskatz

@danielskatz
Copy link

@whedon assign @danielskatz as reviewer

@whedon whedon assigned danielskatz and unassigned danielskatz Nov 1, 2019
@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Nov 1, 2019

OK, the reviewer is @danielskatz

@danielskatz
Copy link

@whedon start review

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Nov 1, 2019

OK, I've started the review over in #1857. Feel free to close this issue now!

@arfon arfon added the rOpenSci Submissions associated with rOpenSci label Feb 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pre-review R rOpenSci Submissions associated with rOpenSci TeX
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants