[PRE REVIEW]: lczexplore : an R package to explore Local Climate Zone classifications

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @MGousseff (Matthieu Gousseff)
Repository: https://github.com/orbisgis/lczexplore
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): master
Version: 0.0.1
Editor: @martinfleis
Reviewers: @matthiasdemuzere, @wcjochem
Managing EiC: Olivia Guest

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/76fbd3ed47b537f386a892f0270ea5f4"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/76fbd3ed47b537f386a892f0270ea5f4/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/76fbd3ed47b537f386a892f0270ea5f4/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/76fbd3ed47b537f386a892f0270ea5f4)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @MGousseff. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@MGousseff if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.47 s (80.3 files/s, 9071.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               29            538            794           1804
Markdown                         3            164              0            413
Rmd                              2            160            197            104
TeX                              1              9              0             82
YAML                             1              2              4             19
JSON                             2              0              0              2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            38            873            995           2424
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 2359

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[oliviaguest]

👋 @martinfleis @elbeejay @hugoledoux @jsta @crvernon can any of you take over this one (even with waitlist)? ☺️ Have a lovely week.

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1016/j.eiar.2015.10.004 may be a valid DOI for title: An energy and mortality impact assessment of the urban heat island in the US
- 10.1016/0013-9351(72)90023-0 may be a valid DOI for title: Some effects of the urban structure on heat mortality
- 10.1175/bams-d-11-00019.1 may be a valid DOI for title: Local climate zones for urban temperature studies
- 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107791 may be a valid DOI for title: A systematic review of GIS-based local climate zone mapping studies
- 10.21105/joss.03541 may be a valid DOI for title: GeoClimate: a Geospatial processing toolbox for environmental and climate studies
- 10.3390/land11050747 may be a valid DOI for title: Inference of Local Climate Zones from GIS Data, and Comparison to WUDAPT Classification and Custom-Fit Clusters
- 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.08.009 may be a valid DOI for title: Evaluating urban heat island in the critical local climate zones of an Indian city

INVALID DOIs

- None

[martinfleis]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

@oliviaguest this is my turf :)

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @martinfleis is now the editor

[oliviaguest]

@martinfleis 🏞️ 🥳 ty

[oliviaguest]

@MGousseff can you fix this, please?

Problem with ORCID (0000-0000-0000-0000) for Matthieu Gousseff. Invalid ORCID

[MGousseff]

Thank you all for reviewing. Sorry I didn't answer earlier, I'm on it.

[MGousseff]

I think it is fixed. By the way, I may have missed something about licencing. The licence.md of the package specifies LGPL-3, which seems OK according to OSI : https://opensource.org/licenses/, but the article says CC by 4.0. I'm still looking for where I need to specify this.

[martinfleis]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[martinfleis]

@MGousseff Thanks! The paper will be released under CC-BY 4.0. That is correct. The license in the PDF does not reflect the license of the code but that of the publication.

[MGousseff]

@martinfleis Thank you very much for the answer, sorry for the naive question !

[martinfleis]

@MGousseff if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

[MGousseff]

I think Matthias Demuzere matthias.demuzere@ruhr-uni-bochum.de could be interested : he is from the WUDAPT team, and GeoClimate and Wudapt are two very complementary workflows : he might even suggest I better document the raster part ! Do you need me to suggest more than one ? Maybe Mike Spencer (mikerspencer) could be interested too ?

[martinfleis]

Hey @kadyb, would you be willing to review this submission for the JOSS?

[matthiasdemuzere]

My R skills are very rusty, yet content-wise this work is my cup of tea. Not sure if this makes me a suitable reviewer? If yes, I am up for it!

[martinfleis]

@matthiasdemuzere That is fine, having one reviewer closer to the topic and the other closer to tech is a good balance ;). Thanks!

[martinfleis]

@editorialbot add @matthiasdemuzere as reviewer.

[editorialbot]

@matthiasdemuzere added to the reviewers list!

[kadyb]

Hi @martinfleis! Thanks a lot for the invitation, but unfortunately I don't have time to deal with it.

[martinfleis]

Hey @wcjochem would you be willing and able to review this? It is very close to your expertise!

[wcjochem]

Hi @martinfleis yes, I can review this. Thanks

[martinfleis]

@editorialbot add @wcjochem as reviewer

@wcjochem Thanks!

[editorialbot]

@wcjochem added to the reviewers list!

[martinfleis]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #5445.