[PRE REVIEW]: crowsetta: A Python tool to work with any format for annotating animal vocalizations and bioacoustics data

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @NickleDave (David Nicholson)
Repository: https://github.com/vocalpy/crowsetta
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): add-joss-paper
Version: 5.0.0
Editor: @oliviaguest
Reviewers: @oliviaguest
Managing EiC: Olivia Guest

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/90e3f5fadaa07b08a20266e00d2fb542"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/90e3f5fadaa07b08a20266e00d2fb542/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/90e3f5fadaa07b08a20266e00d2fb542/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/90e3f5fadaa07b08a20266e00d2fb542)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @NickleDave. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

The AEiC suggestion for the handling editor is @marcosvital.

@NickleDave if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.64 s (205.9 files/s, 22805.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          80           1593           2913           4255
Markdown                        37           1018              0           3937
TeX                              1             34              0            428
YAML                             6             12              8            145
TOML                             1              4              0             73
JSON                             1              0              0             27
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              6              9
reStructuredText                 3             21             84              9
XML                              1              0              0              2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           132           2694           3012           8911
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 989

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[astrojuanlu]

I plan to use crowsetta, so I think I could volunteer as reviewer ✋🏽

[NickleDave]

Just commenting to make sure it doesn't get missed that this was previously reviewed by pyOpenSci: pyOpenSci/software-submission#68

For a previous (recent) JOSS submission following a pyOpenSci review see #5289

[oliviaguest]

@NickleDave!! Oh, so no review needed! Thanks for catching that. 🥰

[NickleDave]

Yes although I would still love @astrojuanlu to give me feedback. Just, not here 😛

[oliviaguest]

@editorialbot assign @oliviaguest as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @oliviaguest is now the editor

[oliviaguest]

@editorialbot add @oliviaguest as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@oliviaguest added to the reviewers list!

[oliviaguest]

@NickleDave can you fix the PDF not compiling? Or is it not on your end, but within JOSS? 🤔

[oliviaguest]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[oliviaguest]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[NickleDave]

@oliviaguest I think I fixed this error -- I left a key and a value out of the author section in the YAML. Whoops! 😬

But now that it builds I see that I actually need to fix up some of the citations and language around them in the statement of need. Sorry! 😳

I got stuck on the build error before and was hoping someone at JOSS could help me figure it out. Finally I saw it when I came back to it with fresh eyes.

Will ping you again once I fix up the citations if that's okay. Working on it now and expect to finish today or tomorrow.

[oliviaguest]

@NickleDave no rush/worries! Thank you! ☺️

[NickleDave]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[NickleDave]

ok @oliviaguest I think I have got it cleaned up now

[oliviaguest]

@editorialbot check references

[oliviaguest]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #5338.

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.09.036 is OK
- 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.811737 is OK
- 10.1111/brv.12160 is OK
- 10.1126/science.298.5598.1569 is OK
- 10.7554/eLife.67855 is OK
- 10.7554/eLife.75691 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0278522 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7627197 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.6808839 is OK
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1503-22.2022 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.6590205 is OK
- 10.1016/j.wocn.2018.07.001 is OK
- 10.1038/sdata.2016.18 is OK
- 10.1038/s41386-018-0303-6 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008228 is OK
- 10.1038/s41467-019-11605-y is OK
- 10.7554/eLife.68837 is OK
- 10.1016/j.wocn.2018.07.001 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7324324 is OK
- 10.1186/s12915-018-0494-7 is OK
- 10.1038/s41593-020-00734-z is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7734979 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2302.10340 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3509134 is OK
- 10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1097/aud.0b013e31821473f7 may be a valid DOI for title: Praat: doing phonetics by computer
- 10.3389/fninf.2018.00016 may be a valid DOI for title: Experimental Directory Structure (Exdir): An Alternative to HDF5 Without Introducing a New File Format

INVALID DOIs

- None