-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 152
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Nominations open for the Code of Conduct Moderation Panel #985
Comments
I'd like to self-nominate. |
1 similar comment
I'd like to self-nominate. |
@SaraJo wanted to self-nominate. I deleted her message because it contained PII. |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
I am happy to self nominate to help but if there are enough people the CPC is comfortable with that self nominated I am happy to let them take this :) |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Thanks for volunteering y'all. It would be great to maximize gender and geographic diversity on the CoC team. Also it would be great to include folks who have experience dealing with CoC violations if we have any. Finally, it would be good to understand nominee's perspective on the Foundation's code of conduct:
|
For me, yes, yes, yes, and yes; I've been on TC39's CoC committee for years, spent years on node's moderation team, and currently moderate the node and JS channels on Libera IRC, as well as the node and babel slacks. |
That's the bit I think I am volunteering for. Moderation is typically unglamorous janitorial work (at least from my perspective) and moderators enforce the CoC which helps promote collaboration and a professional, friendly environment. My experience moderating Node.js core for the past ±5 years (3 of them with @ljharb where I can also note he did a good and impartial job as moderator) is that enforcing the CoC and facilitating discussion is very valuable.
The CoC is very ambiguous which has in the past lead to issues when enforcing it - that's the big one. That said, I don't really have big improvement suggestions and I like the current CoC. I also believe we've been able to successfully resolve any ambiguous moderation issues in the past by involving project leadership (the CPC in this case).
No, every offender is a human and their background in the project and previous conflicts often weighs in when making moderation decisions. For example: first time contributors typically get a lot more leniency than long time contributors, and the communication style is often a lot more guiding and different with them. On the other hand project leadership (and moderation) is bound by much stricter standards.
That is what I thought I am signing up for :) Again, I am happy to volunteer my time but if there are enough other volunteers I am happy to give my place to improve diversity. The CoC actually being enforced and enough eyes on it is the bit I care about and why I've volunteered moderating in Node.js itself. |
I'm so happy I asked these questions and got so thoughtful answers. Very humbling. I'd love to hear from the other folks who nominated themselves too. A few additional meta thoughts about how to figure out who to add to the CoC team
I'll wrap all of these up and suggest policy changes accordingly in the relevant PRs. Done, see: #984 (comment). |
Closing in favor of #1298. If you've self-nominated in the past and are still up for it. Please self-nominate again in the new issue! Thank you! |
This relates to recent PR #984, where we've made changes to the Code of Conduct Moderation Panel, including slimming down the amount of folks on this panel. This panel will consist of 3 people selected by CPC as described in #984. Additionally, the panel will include the Foundation ED and Marketing Lead
Please self-nominate or encourage someone you think would be a good candidate for this role. 🎉
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: