Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Remote Store] Feature Feedback #4576

Open
sachinpkale opened this issue Sep 23, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

[Remote Store] Feature Feedback #4576

sachinpkale opened this issue Sep 23, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
discuss Issues intended to help drive brainstorming and decision making enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request Storage:Durability Issues and PRs related to the durability framework

Comments

@sachinpkale
Copy link
Member

A meta issue to consolidate all the feedback for the new experimental feature - Remote Store option for improved durability.

Documentation - https://opensearch.org/docs/latest/opensearch/remote/
Feature Proposal - #1968
Design Proposal - #2700
Tasks that are part of 2.3 release - #3974
Backlog - #2992
@sachinpkale sachinpkale added enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request untriaged labels Sep 23, 2022
@sachinpkale sachinpkale mentioned this issue Sep 23, 2022
Closed
@kotwanikunal kotwanikunal added the Storage:Durability Issues and PRs related to the durability framework label Sep 26, 2022
@andrross andrross added discuss Issues intended to help drive brainstorming and decision making and removed untriaged labels Oct 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
discuss Issues intended to help drive brainstorming and decision making enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request Storage:Durability Issues and PRs related to the durability framework
Projects
Storage Project Board
Status: 🆕 New
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@sachinpkale @andrross @kotwanikunal