Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Remove mapping types #37

Closed
dreamer-89 opened this issue Mar 2, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Remove mapping types #37

dreamer-89 opened this issue Mar 2, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
breaking Breaks existing funtionality enhancement New feature or request v2.0.0 Related to OpenSearch 2.0

Comments

@dreamer-89
Copy link
Member

As part of v2.0 release, mapping types are getting removed from OpenSearch engine. Below are the changes in the opensearch-engine.

  • Removal of type from rest end-points
  • Removal of include_type_name parameter from API requests.

As part of this issue, please verify if type removal change on OpenSearch engine impacts this repository. If yes, then please remove the type references/usage from this plugin.

Related: OpenSearch-engine meta issue
@dreamer-89 dreamer-89 added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 2, 2022
@dreamer-89
Copy link
Member Author

This change goes in v2.0.0 release in OpenSearch repository and is a breaking change. Request maintainer to add appropriate labels.

@dreamer-89 dreamer-89 mentioned this issue Mar 10, 2022
Closed
67 tasks
@travisbenedict travisbenedict added v2.0.0 Related to OpenSearch 2.0 breaking Breaks existing funtionality labels Mar 30, 2022
@travisbenedict
Copy link
Contributor

travisbenedict commented Apr 19, 2022 •
edited
Loading

This repository is not impacted by this change.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
breaking Breaks existing funtionality enhancement New feature or request v2.0.0 Related to OpenSearch 2.0
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@travisbenedict @dreamer-89