You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem?
The documentation shows that geopoint may be in many formats. One such format I used is WKT [Well-Known Text]. This is currently in use for my project. However, when I tried to use the Observability features, an error message was generated stating my geopoint was not valid and only the format "{ "lat": number, "lon": number }" is supported.
What solution would you like?
Support WKT and other valid formats for geo points / geo shapes.
What alternatives have you considered?
I would need to redo my design to change all WKT uses to the one format supported.
Do you have any additional context?
Overall, if possible, have a consistence use of fields like geo-shape.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem?
The documentation shows that geopoint may be in many formats. One such format I used is WKT [Well-Known Text]. This is currently in use for my project. However, when I tried to use the Observability features, an error message was generated stating my geopoint was not valid and only the format "{ "lat": number, "lon": number }" is supported.
What solution would you like?
Support WKT and other valid formats for geo points / geo shapes.
What alternatives have you considered?
I would need to redo my design to change all WKT uses to the one format supported.
Do you have any additional context?
Overall, if possible, have a consistence use of fields like geo-shape.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: