operator install: honor operatorframework.io/suggested-namespace #52
Conversation
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
do-not-merge/hold
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
approved
joelanford
force-pushed
the
suggested-namespace
branch
from
b345abb to
b09a75f
Compare
joelanford
force-pushed
the
suggested-namespace
branch
from
b09a75f to
57b3597
Compare
joelanford
force-pushed
the
suggested-namespace
branch
from
57b3597 to
bf48013
Compare
…efault Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <joe.lanford@gmail.com>
joelanford
force-pushed
the
suggested-namespace
branch
from
bf48013 to
3e3f998
Compare
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: joelanford The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
| @@ -110,6 +128,18 @@ func (i *OperatorInstall) getPackageManifest(ctx context.Context) (*operator.Pac | |||
| return &operator.PackageManifest{PackageManifest: *pm}, nil | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| func (i *OperatorInstall) ensureNamespace(ctx context.Context, pc *operator.PackageChannel) error { | |||
| suggestedNamespace := pc.CurrentCSVDesc.Annotations["operatorframework.io/suggested-namespace"] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It can panic if pc is nil, but that can't happen because pm.GetChannel() (called one function up in the stack) doesn't return nil, nil
Other than that, it can't panic:
pc.CurrentCSVDescis a concrete structpc.CurrentCSVDesc.Annotationsis a map[string]string
If you do a lookup of a key in a nil map, the returned value is the default value of the value type.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If you do a lookup of a key in a nil map, the returned value is the default value of the value type.
TIL! This is kinda crazy to me because a map is really a pointer to an hmap, so you're dereferencing and indexing a nil pointer.
openshift-merge-robot
added
the
needs-rebase
|
@joelanford: PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
closing due to inactivity - please re-open if needed ^^ |
Description:
Updates
kubectl operator installto honor CSVs that provide anoperatorframework.io/suggested-namespaceannotation.Motivation:
Closes #50
/hold
I can't find any upstream documentation for
operatorframework.io/suggested-namespace, so I'm somewhat concerned that we're adding support for a downstream feature. There's nothing actually OpenShift-specific with this annotation other than that OpenShift Console is the only current client that supports it. I think this would be as simple as a doc change to upstream OLM docs that specifies this annotation and describes what clients should do when it's present.Downstream enhancement describes this annotation here: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/olm/olm-managed-operator-metrics.md#fulfilling-namespace-and-rbac-requirements