You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In operator-registry we already use codecov so this can be our baseline. But we should be open to consider other reporting solutons keeping in mind that eventually (out of scope for this ticket) we want to have multiple coverage profiles (unit tests, e2e, etc) and should be able to combine them together.
Note: make test-unit already produces coverage report, but it currently is left unused.
Acceptance criteria:
We should be able to view visual code coverage report
We should be able to measure diff in code coverage between master and a pull request
Test job must fail if there is an issue publishing the report to to code coverage solution
We should have non-blocking checks on PR reporting the diff
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In operator-registry we already use codecov so this can be our baseline. But we should be open to consider other reporting solutons keeping in mind that eventually (out of scope for this ticket) we want to have multiple coverage profiles (unit tests, e2e, etc) and should be able to combine them together.
Note:
make test-unit
already produces coverage report, but it currently is left unused.Acceptance criteria:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: