Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(evpn-bridge): fix for frr to handle vrf setup and teardown #401

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

venkyvsp
Copy link
Contributor

fix: frr handle the duplicate vni and deleting of non-existence vrf and svi.

Signed-off-by: Venkatesh, Vemula <venkatesh.vemula@intel.com>
@venkyvsp venkyvsp marked this pull request as ready for review September 25, 2024 07:50
@venkyvsp venkyvsp requested a review from a team as a code owner September 25, 2024 07:50
@venkyvsp venkyvsp marked this pull request as draft September 27, 2024 11:47
if strings.Contains(data, "Can't find BGP instance") { // Trying to delete non exist VRF return true
return true
}
if err != nil || checkFrrResult(data, false) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if we need to check frr for each frr cmd, why not move that check into FrrBgpCmd/FrrZebraCmd and other frr functions?

as well as strings.Contains(?

if err != nil {
data, err = Frr.FrrZebraCmd(ctx, fmt.Sprintf("configure terminal\n %s\n exit\n", delCmd2))
if err != nil || checkFrrResult(data, false) {
log.Printf("FRR: Error %s\n", data)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does data contain error description?

@@ -437,7 +430,7 @@ func setUpVrf(vrf *infradb.Vrf) (string, bool) {

// checkFrrResult checks the vrf result
func checkFrrResult(cp string, show bool) bool {
return ((show && reflect.ValueOf(cp).IsZero()) || strings.Contains(cp, "warning") || strings.Contains(cp, "unknown") || strings.Contains(cp, "Unknown") || strings.Contains(cp, "Warning") || strings.Contains(cp, "Ambiguous") || strings.Contains(cp, "specified does not exist"))
return ((show && reflect.ValueOf(cp).IsZero()) || strings.Contains(cp, "warning") || strings.Contains(cp, "unknown") || strings.Contains(cp, "Unknown") || strings.Contains(cp, "Warning") || strings.Contains(cp, "Ambiguous") || strings.Contains(cp, "specified does not exist") || strings.Contains(cp, "Error"))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

reflect.ValueOf(cp).IsZero()) -> cp == ""

what if cp contains waRning? Will you add a new comparison then? Will it be better to lower case the string and only then check what itcontains?

}
hname, _ := os.Hostname()
L2vpnCmd := strings.Split(cp, "json")
L2vpnCmd = strings.Split(L2vpnCmd[1], hname)
cp = L2vpnCmd[0]
// fmt.Printf("FRR_L2vpn[0]: %s\n",cp)
if len(cp) != 7 {
if len(cp) != 7 { // Checking CMD o/p
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

magic number. Rely on string length is very unreliable

@artek-koltun artek-koltun marked this pull request as ready for review September 27, 2024 13:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants