We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
observed using falling ramp! Should not change much, but including short-circuit current @ 0V would be the proper solution.
system time [s]; current [A]; voltage [V] 2024-10-24 11:48:52.017140; 0.0017443847656250001; 0.038828125 2024-10-24 11:48:52.017150; 0.0017441813151041667; 0.033359375000000004 2024-10-24 11:48:52.017160; 0.0017445882161458335; 0.02783203125 2024-10-24 11:48:52.017170; 0.0017449951171875002; 0.02248046875 2024-10-24 11:48:52.017180; 0.0017439778645833334; 0.0171875
0 to 5.000 V with 909 Steps should produce step-size of (V_max - V_min)/(n - 1) = 5.5066 mV (and it does)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
observed using falling ramp! Should not change much, but including short-circuit current @ 0V would be the proper solution.
0 to 5.000 V with 909 Steps should produce step-size of (V_max - V_min)/(n - 1) = 5.5066 mV (and it does)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: