You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since there are some big changes for osm2pgsql upcoming, including a new 'middle' database format / schema, new options for expiry, faster -append etc, wouldn't it be a good idea to have 2.0 as release number instead of 1.9.0?
Or is 2.0 going to be where the old 'pgsql' output is going to be dropped (if there are any plans for that), and possibly the experimental generalization options integrated?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Since there are some big changes for osm2pgsql upcoming, including a new 'middle' database format / schema, new options for expiry, faster -append etc, wouldn't it be a good idea to have 2.0 as release number instead of 1.9.0?
Or is 2.0 going to be where the old 'pgsql' output is going to be dropped (if there are any plans for that), and possibly the experimental generalization options integrated?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions