You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For our next release, I believe that we want to fork wasmd to re-enable stargate queries. We eventually want to move to a whitelist approach, so we can control which queries were making state machine compatability guarantees about. Until they are added back, it must be part of contract review to ensure that all approved contract queries are fine.
To be more precise:
A query that is exposed should not have any fields deleted, otherwise it will be state machine breaking
When gas tracking is added, it should not be changed within a minor version.
And we should have a beaker test doing this.
As part of this, we should also scope how hard would it be to build a whitelist. (hopefully not much, seeing as we already have a string description of the query type)
Suggested Design
We need to investigate how stargate queries were removed, so that we can add them back.
Acceptance Criteria
It is possible to use stargate queries in forked cosmwasm.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Background
For our next release, I believe that we want to fork wasmd to re-enable stargate queries. We eventually want to move to a whitelist approach, so we can control which queries were making state machine compatability guarantees about. Until they are added back, it must be part of contract review to ensure that all approved contract queries are fine.
To be more precise:
And we should have a beaker test doing this.
As part of this, we should also scope how hard would it be to build a whitelist. (hopefully not much, seeing as we already have a string description of the query type)
Suggested Design
We need to investigate how stargate queries were removed, so that we can add them back.
Acceptance Criteria
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: