Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Image quality degradation in new versions #231

Open
aiheadshots opened this issue Dec 6, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Image quality degradation in new versions #231

aiheadshots opened this issue Dec 6, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@aiheadshots
Copy link

I trained my flux model on replicate but as new version ID of the model comes, it degrades my image quality. I've a product developed on flux replicate LoRA trainer. This is seriously concerning as I have to start over and spend more effort to get same quality

Suppose I trained my model on version 2. After some time version 10 comes but version 2 is unavailable and model is trained on minimum available version like 5. How will I get same consistency in image quality.

I trained a flux LoRA model in late September. Now I train a new model on replicate platform on same person images with same parameter and same prompt, I get a cartoony image but previous I was getting realistic high quality image.

I again trained model in replicate on same dataset, same parameters, same prompt but the september version is still giving different quality.

I'm developing a product and with these uncertainties how will I ensure in future my users will get same results
I would be great if you guys can share your thoughts @jaretburkett @apolinario @fofr @FoundSol @liaoliaojun

@aipjn
Copy link

aipjn commented Dec 17, 2024

same

@PsyChip
Copy link

PsyChip commented Dec 18, 2024

as i noticed there was automatic image captioning in earlier versions, last version doesn't have that by default

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants