Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

KeyCombo renders mod as ^ instead of Ctrl on Windows #6211

Closed
alexbrt opened this issue Jun 8, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #7025
Closed

KeyCombo renders mod as ^ instead of Ctrl on Windows #6211

alexbrt opened this issue Jun 8, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #7025

Comments

@alexbrt
Copy link

alexbrt commented Jun 8, 2023

Environment

  • Package version(s): 4.20.1
  • Operating System: macOS Ventura 13.4 (22F66)
  • Browser name and version: Version 114.0.5735.106 (Official Build) (arm64)

Code Sandbox

Link to a minimal repro (fork this code sandbox):

Steps to reproduce

N/A

Actual behavior

^ is rendered instead of Ctrl on Windows.

Expected behavior

I expected Ctrl to be rendered instead of ^.

Possible solution

Check for mod instead of meta here?

@alexbrt alexbrt changed the title KeyCombo renders ^ instead of Ctrl on Windows KeyCombo renders mod as ^ instead of Ctrl on Windows Jun 8, 2023
@adidahiya
Copy link
Contributor

@alexbrt do you have the same issue with Blueprint v5? Any bugfix for this is unlikely to be backported to v4.x.

@Zaida-3dO
Copy link

Zaida-3dO commented Oct 23, 2024

Hello, this issue still exists on Blueprint v5

Code Sandbox

Link to a minimal repro https://codesandbox.io/p/devbox/rough-microservice-gdctt3

Screenshots

Mac Windows
image image

Expected behavior

I expected Ctrl to be rendered instead of ^ Ctrl on the standard KeyComboTag. This is because ^ icon doesn't mean much to windows users so it is unnecessary here

A bigger issue is on the minimal version, I expected Ctrl A instead of ^ A because the latter would be completely unreadable for most windows users as they would have no idea what the ^ icon means

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants