You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pandas.
(optional) I have confirmed this bug exists on the master branch of pandas.
I was looking into #34765 which traced back to the parsers in general and isn't excel specific. For both the c and python engines, using a multiple line header and index_col which doesn't include only the leftmost columns, results are unexpected:
a b c d
e f g h
x y 1 2
MultiIndex([('b', 'f'),
('c', 'g'),
('d', 'h')],
names=['a', 'e'])
Expected Output
So I'd expect
b a c d
f e g h
y x 1 2
MultiIndex([('a', 'e'),
('c', 'g'),
('d', 'h')],
names=['b', 'f'])
The other possibility is that maybe this behavior just shouldn't be supported and if multiple headers lines are specified, passing an index_col != range(n) just raises.
Output of pd.show_versions()
INSTALLED VERSIONS
commit : d4b6233
python : 3.8.6.final.0
python-bits : 64
OS : Darwin
OS-release : 19.6.0
Version : Darwin Kernel Version 19.6.0: Thu Oct 29 22:56:45 PDT 2020; root:xnu-6153.141.2.2~1/RELEASE_X86_64
machine : x86_64
processor : i386
byteorder : little
LC_ALL : None
LANG : None
LOCALE : None.UTF-8
I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pandas.
(optional) I have confirmed this bug exists on the master branch of pandas.
I was looking into #34765 which traced back to the parsers in general and isn't excel specific. For both the
c
andpython
engines, using a multiple line header andindex_col
which doesn't include only the leftmost columns, results are unexpected:Code Sample, a copy-pastable example
or
gives
Problem description
I'd expect in the first example the output to match what happens with
index_col = 0
:Expected Output
So I'd expect
The other possibility is that maybe this behavior just shouldn't be supported and if multiple headers lines are specified, passing an
index_col != range(n)
just raises.Output of
pd.show_versions()
INSTALLED VERSIONS
commit : d4b6233
python : 3.8.6.final.0
python-bits : 64
OS : Darwin
OS-release : 19.6.0
Version : Darwin Kernel Version 19.6.0: Thu Oct 29 22:56:45 PDT 2020; root:xnu-6153.141.2.2~1/RELEASE_X86_64
machine : x86_64
processor : i386
byteorder : little
LC_ALL : None
LANG : None
LOCALE : None.UTF-8
pandas : 1.3.0.dev0+90.gd4b623361.dirty
numpy : 1.19.4
pytz : 2020.4
dateutil : 2.8.1
pip : 20.3.1
setuptools : 49.6.0.post20201009
Cython : 0.29.21
pytest : 6.2.0
hypothesis : 5.43.3
sphinx : 3.3.1
blosc : None
feather : None
xlsxwriter : 1.3.7
lxml.etree : 4.6.2
html5lib : 1.1
pymysql : None
psycopg2 : None
jinja2 : 2.11.2
IPython : 7.19.0
pandas_datareader: None
bs4 : 4.9.3
bottleneck : 1.3.2
fsspec : 0.8.4
fastparquet : 0.4.1
gcsfs : 0.7.1
matplotlib : 3.3.3
numexpr : 2.7.1
odfpy : None
openpyxl : 3.0.5
pandas_gbq : None
pyarrow : 2.0.0
pyxlsb : None
s3fs : 0.4.2
scipy : 1.5.3
sqlalchemy : 1.3.20
tables : 3.6.1
tabulate : 0.8.7
xarray : 0.16.2
xlrd : 1.2.0
xlwt : 1.3.0
numba : 0.52.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: