Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GH24241 make Categorical.map transform nans #24275

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 20, 2018
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion doc/source/categorical.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1145,7 +1145,8 @@ dtype in apply

Pandas currently does not preserve the dtype in apply functions: If you apply along rows you get
a `Series` of ``object`` `dtype` (same as getting a row -> getting one element will return a
basic type) and applying along columns will also convert to object.
basic type) and applying along columns will also convert to object. ``NaN`` values are unaffected.
You can use ``fillna`` to handle missing values before applying a function.

.. ipython:: python

Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions doc/source/whatsnew/v0.24.0.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1273,6 +1273,7 @@ Categorical
- Bug when resampling :meth:`Dataframe.resample()` and aggregating on categorical data, the categorical dtype was getting lost. (:issue:`23227`)
- Bug in many methods of the ``.str``-accessor, which always failed on calling the ``CategoricalIndex.str`` constructor (:issue:`23555`, :issue:`23556`)
- Bug in :meth:`Series.where` losing the categorical dtype for categorical data (:issue:`24077`)
- Bug in :meth:`Categorical.apply` where ``NaN`` values could be handled unpredictably. They now remain unchanged (:issue:`24241`)

Datetimelike
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Expand Down
7 changes: 6 additions & 1 deletion pandas/core/arrays/categorical.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1166,7 +1166,7 @@ def map(self, mapper):
Maps the categories to new categories. If the mapping correspondence is
one-to-one the result is a :class:`~pandas.Categorical` which has the
same order property as the original, otherwise a :class:`~pandas.Index`
is returned.
is returned. NaN values are unaffected.

If a `dict` or :class:`~pandas.Series` is used any unmapped category is
mapped to `NaN`. Note that if this happens an :class:`~pandas.Index`
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1234,6 +1234,11 @@ def map(self, mapper):
categories=new_categories,
ordered=self.ordered)
except ValueError:
# NA values are represented in self._codes with -1
# np.take causes NA values to take final element in new_categories
if np.any(self._codes == -1):
new_categories = new_categories.insert(len(new_categories),
np.nan)
return np.take(new_categories, self._codes)

__eq__ = _cat_compare_op('__eq__')
Expand Down
23 changes: 23 additions & 0 deletions pandas/tests/indexes/test_category.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -311,6 +311,29 @@ def test_map_with_categorical_series(self):
exp = pd.Index(["odd", "even", "odd", np.nan])
tm.assert_index_equal(a.map(c), exp)

@pytest.mark.parametrize(
(
'data',
'f'
),
(
([1, 1, np.nan], pd.isna),
([1, 2, np.nan], pd.isna),
([1, 1, np.nan], {1: False}),
([1, 2, np.nan], {1: False, 2: False}),
([1, 1, np.nan], pd.Series([False, False])),
([1, 2, np.nan], pd.Series([False, False, False]))
))
def test_map_with_nan(self, data, f): # GH 24241
values = pd.Categorical(data)
TomAugspurger marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
result = values.map(f)
if data[1] == 1:
expected = pd.Categorical([False, False, np.nan])
tm.assert_categorical_equal(result, expected)
else:
expected = pd.Index([False, False, np.nan])
tm.assert_index_equal(result, expected)

@pytest.mark.parametrize('klass', [list, tuple, np.array, pd.Series])
def test_where(self, klass):
i = self.create_index()
Expand Down