Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use package name instead of lib name for metadata dependency #107

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 13, 2020

Conversation

ascjones
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #106, and any other case where the [lib] name field does not match exactly with the contract package name.

This PR fixes this by using the package name when generating the dependency from the metadata package.

@ascjones ascjones merged commit 69a9fae into master Nov 13, 2020
@ascjones ascjones mentioned this pull request Nov 27, 2020
@HCastano HCastano deleted the aj-contract-package-name branch July 29, 2022 17:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

while building metadata for contract-transfer - no matching package named contract_transfer found
2 participants