-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 142
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Status of OPUS Codec #8
Comments
Work on Opus hasn't started yet, but it's the next item on the road map. Before I can begin work on Opus the OGG branch must be merged. However, before I can do that I first need to re-work some of Sonata's public API. This work is about 80% complete. |
Okay. Thanks for the update. I'll keep an eye on the repository in the meantime. |
Hi, any status updates on this? I'd love to replace libopus with a pure rust thing in one of my projects and Symphonia looks most promising. |
Hi @Gelbpunkt, The prerequisite work noted above has been completed, however I'm afraid to say that not much progress has been made on the Opus decoder itself. I'm on a bit of a temporary hiatus from my personal projects at the moment so I wouldn't expect anything soon. |
Some time has passed; any news on opus? |
Sorry to say, but there's not much to report. 😕 Haven't had the time to do much beyond bug fixes. I'd suggest looking for alternative crates if you need Opus support. |
Hey @pdeljanov, can I give this a go? |
@thinking-tower, please, go ahead. You can use the |
@pdeljanov I'm still working on this ticket btw! Thanks for your patience 😄 |
Hey @thinking-tower, that's good to hear! Are you running into any challenges or issues? Opus is a pretty complex codec, so feel free to submit multiple PRs to the |
@pdeljanov At the moment, not any issues yet. I like the idea of splitting up the commits into multiple PRs! |
Hi @thinking-tower! Are you actively working on a decoder for Opus? I would like to help with the implementation. |
Hi @darksv, Thanks for volunteering to work on this. Let's wait a bit longer to give a chance for @thinking-tower to respond, but as far as I know the Opus decoder hasn't been actively worked on in a long time. There are two Opus related branches. The first is the It would probably be worthwhile to first bring I think for Opus you should aim for smaller PRs that can be merged into |
Hi @darksv and @pdeljanov, I am still working on the Opus decoder. I'm definitely happy to receive help! @darksv I'm currently just debugging the official repo (https://github.com/xiph/opus) to get a better feel of how the decoding process works, are you familiar with Opus yourself? @pdeljanov Thanks again for your patience! |
@thinking-tower Not really. I've read some parts of the RFC and looked into the official implementation a bit, but I'm not very familiar with Opus just yet. |
Perhaps this work should be divided into SILK and CELT sub-codecs. SILK being used for lower bandwidth speech and CELT is for higher bandwidth music, typically. |
I'll pay a bounty (~$500) to whomever lands This is important for dealing with web uploads as browser APIs use opus. Bonus points if media duration is easy to extract. |
I will match @echelon's offer.
all determinations as to (sub-)task completion decision is upto @pdeljanov and obviously these are payable to @pdeljanov as well (in this case I will request for tests to be implemented as well for objective review of achievement) |
I think i might start with 1 myself |
I just found this repository opus-native, which aims to implement opus codec in pure Rust. |
@JSDurand thanks for mentioning opus-native. |
@chris-ha458 Yes, that is not finished. But it did implement some decoding logics, such as the range decoding, and the outer-most decoder logic. I am not familiar with this topic, so I cannot tell how completed it is, though. Just thought this might help the implementers if they did not know about that repository previously. |
@JSDurand thanks for that link, it'll be helpful for me. @chris-ha458 How are you getting on with this? I've got some time to work on this now. |
I think the only fair and reasonable approach would be to defer to the maintainer atm. |
I was working on this before, so I'll continue. I'm happy to work with anyone interested. |
Hey, can I ask what the current state of this is? I would assume the API changes mentioned earlier are done and that the OGG implementation is now at a point where the opus codec can be implemented? This looks interesting and I might take a shot at it over the weekends (no promises though). @thinking-tower are you still actively working on this? And if so, what are you working on atm? |
Hi, any updates on this? @pdeljanov @thinking-tower |
Bumping this, as I too would really like opus support. |
+1 |
(stop spamming the thread with junk that 99% of people who are subscribed don't want to see) |
To be clear I was referring to the message from just a few minutes ago, not yours from 4 days ago The problem is that I do want to be subscribed, but I don't want "+1" notifications when I'm subscribed to hundreds of issues Edit: I'm going to stop replying to avoid further derailing now |
What is the status of work on the opus Codec? I see it marked as
next
in the readme, is there an ETA for release?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: