You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
That makes sense. It is easy enough to take the list of reserved IPs from wikipedia and use the ip-range-check package to compare against it. I would argue it is better anyway and keeps this package smaller
Evaluating
localhost
returns{ type: 'RESERVED', hostname: 'localhost', labels: [ 'localhost' ] }
but evaluating
127.0.0.1
returns{ type: 'IP', hostname: '127.0.0.1', ipVersion: 4 }
Although technically true, shouldn't reserved IP address be marked as such?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: