Protobuild support #1
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
grod220
commented
Dec 9, 2023
|
@avahowell @hdevalence the core of this fixes our issues. Would be helpful to pair on some snags with tendermint proto. Maybe monday? 🍐 |
grod220
force-pushed
the
protobuild-support
branch
2 times, most recently
from
b576d68 to
988584b
Compare
grod220
force-pushed
the
protobuild-support
branch
from
988584b to
5e9056e
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Addresses: cosmos#165
Original attempt does not seem to implement protojson like we expected: cosmos#95
Note: