You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
pmrep -a 20160718.12.38.0 -z -S '@19:45' -s 20 -J3 -2 -u proc.io.read_bytes 0.05s user 0.01s system 99% cpu 0.069 total
pmrep -a 20160718.12.38.0 -z -S '@19:45' -s 20 -J3 -2 -t 1sec proc.io.read_bytes 0.19s user 0.05s system 99% cpu 0.252 total
pmrep -a 20160718.12.38.0 -z -S '@19:45' -s 20 -J3 -2 -t 10min 2.42s user 0.53s system 99% cpu 2.967 total
Adding a simple print debug in the Python code (around line 1145 in the beginning of the fetch() method) we see that the number of C calls for each is the same (as expected due to -s 20). The first one disables interpolation (-u) but the next two use it with different interval (1s vs 10min).
The question is why the -t 10min case is so much slower than the -t 1sec case, is there anything that could be done to improve this?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Using https://fedorapeople.org/~nathans/archives/goody.tgz we see with the latest git code:
pmrep -a 20160718.12.38.0 -z -S '@19:45' -s 20 -J3 -2 -u proc.io.read_bytes 0.05s user 0.01s system 99% cpu 0.069 total
pmrep -a 20160718.12.38.0 -z -S '@19:45' -s 20 -J3 -2 -t 1sec proc.io.read_bytes 0.19s user 0.05s system 99% cpu 0.252 total
pmrep -a 20160718.12.38.0 -z -S '@19:45' -s 20 -J3 -2 -t 10min 2.42s user 0.53s system 99% cpu 2.967 total
Adding a simple print debug in the Python code (around line 1145 in the beginning of the fetch() method) we see that the number of C calls for each is the same (as expected due to -s 20). The first one disables interpolation (-u) but the next two use it with different interval (1s vs 10min).
The question is why the -t 10min case is so much slower than the -t 1sec case, is there anything that could be done to improve this?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: