The Why?
Below are all the values we identify:
- Truth
- Immunity
- Sovereignty
- Functionality
- Highly-adaptable
- Anti-fragility
- Cohesion
- Rapture
- Coherence
- Humility
- Collaboration
- Inclusion
- Competence
- Trust
We developed two basic types of values - some were human centric, the others were systematical.
| QUESTIONS | ANSWERS |
|---|---|
| Is anti-fragility similar to high adaptability? | |
| Is humility similar to acknowledging uncertainty? | |
| Do you think that DGov represents the hope to reflect the values of a world we want to live in? | |
| What is the difference between distribution and decentralisation? | |
| Why the values? | |
|
Are we challenging the current system? Capitalism gives a frame, yet capitalism necessarily is not bed and can be upgraded? Or should we think about it in terms of it being eliminated? These values are what our system is theoretically based on. We are already thinking about distributed governance |
Yes, we are building a new system for the commons, which will challenge what the existing system is. It’s not about incentives fetishism. |
Chris: the end system will look like a hierarchy. We’re talking about distribution but these systems are nested in each other, overlapping constantly. The governance as distribution of power is all about how the overlapping functions, what are the patterns we can identify to achieve the values.
Why distributed governance? Less captured then centred.
Eliminating the ones we don’t feel fit so a strong core remains.
There’s a lot of cohesion between the values and we might separate them a bit so we make a systematic pattern.
We need to find out the minimal structure, minimal viable systems and minimal viable structure is that we need for the system to evolve.
We already have some patterns - on one hand we have those that we all know and we need to find how we’re going to combine them, while on the other hand we have values that we don’t commonly recognise and need to start with the common understanding of them.
When we have different cultural backgrounds it is difficult to kick start as a DAO, we do need a cohesion around the values. In every human based system there is a value story and a structure for governing how we rule. If we speak about ‘’code as a law’’ there is a bias perception.
If we’re focusing on a structure there might be a danger lingering upon this that we forget why we’re doing it.
Last 5 minutes: reading the questions and reflecting upon.
We’re being capable of going from complexity while we can still open to some specific issues we need to address is something we need to take into consideration. It’s revealing for those who can contribute more with the knowledge they possess in other fields.
A young idea
Challenges ahead
Growth and strengthening
How to achieve maximum diversity?
Viral - educational curriculum
Mapping out the landscape (different organisation for legal applications, who we are working with, who are the stakeholders)
What is the DAO?
Jim - DAO Incubator
Who should participate
Setting the boundaries
Legal entity
Concerns to foresee
How do we make decisions
Formalisation of structures
Risk
Reputation
Transparency
Common economics