Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add --verbose flag so I can watch pip-compile progress #153

Closed
graingert opened this issue Aug 8, 2019 · 8 comments
Closed

add --verbose flag so I can watch pip-compile progress #153

graingert opened this issue Aug 8, 2019 · 8 comments

Comments

@graingert
Copy link

jazzband/pip-tools#521

@peterdemin
Copy link
Owner

I've read the linked issue, and my understanding of the problem is that at times pip-tools runs extremely slow and it's hard to tell if it's making any progress (correct me if I'm wrong).
While having a progress bar might look nice, I feel like this feature will make code harder to maintain without any adding practical benefit.
I'm closing the issue, but feel free to reopen with a good argument.

@graingert
Copy link
Author

graingert commented Aug 8, 2019

Even without the progress bars it's good to be able to see what package is taking a long time

@peterdemin
Copy link
Owner

Yeah, must be feeling good, but how does this information help? I mean, there is no way to speed up any particular package. pip-tools will take as much time as it needs. And the slow package will be slow during installation too, so it's not an insight.

@graingert
Copy link
Author

@peterdemin I don't really care too much about the progress bar, just some sort of verbose output

sometimes I end up with pathological cases where it's sat retrying because I forgot to connect to the VPN

@peterdemin peterdemin reopened this Oct 7, 2019
@peterdemin
Copy link
Owner

I'll be happy to review the PR with this feature. -v/—verbose that streams live pip-tools progress.

@john-sandall
Copy link

john-sandall commented Mar 20, 2021

@graingert Stumbled across this issue whilst searching for exactly the same feature. I've sketched out a partial solution in #247, reckon it's got legs?

@john-sandall
Copy link

Closed by #251?

@peterdemin
Copy link
Owner

Yes, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants