Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Getting "Der Ziel-Link konnte nicht gefunden werden" #454

Open
jaschaurbach opened this issue Jan 3, 2024 · 8 comments
Open

Getting "Der Ziel-Link konnte nicht gefunden werden" #454

jaschaurbach opened this issue Jan 3, 2024 · 8 comments

Comments

@jaschaurbach
Copy link

Hi!

Out of the blue I get the error "Der Ziel-Link konnte nicht gefunden werden" from bird.gy - see here

When I try it to add it manually via https://jascha.wtf/wp-json/webmention/1.0/endpoint I get the same error:

Bildschirmfoto 2024-01-03 um 16 59 48 Bildschirmfoto 2024-01-03 um 16 59 54

Any idea what I could do to further debug this issue? The destination of course exists

@pfefferle
Copy link
Owner

pfefferle commented Jan 3, 2024

The destination exists, but the plugin can't find a link to your post in the brid.gy html.

See: https://pin13.net/mf2/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbrid.gy%2Fcomment%2Fmastodon%2F%40jascha%40ohai.social%2F111681444048580159%2F111681453109020359

/cc @snarfed

@pfefferle
Copy link
Owner

Perhaps we need to change the error message a little to make this clearer!

@jaschaurbach
Copy link
Author

But it was an answer to a comment. So it might be in the side of Brid.gy to name the parent comment

@pfefferle
Copy link
Owner

Oh is this a threaded comment thing? An answer to a comment to your post, not your post directly?

If so, then this is not supported by the Webmention plugin (yet)!

@pfefferle
Copy link
Owner

The plugin checks for URLs with the same domain and rejects any other request. When we started working on Webmentions we have not thought about bridges to other social network protocols like ActivityPub.

So to support that we would have to think about how to implement that properly.

@dshanske
Copy link
Collaborator

dshanske commented Jan 5, 2024

The plugin checks for URLs with the same domain and rejects any other request. When we started working on Webmentions we have not thought about bridges to other social network protocols like ActivityPub.

So to support that we would have to think about how to implement that properly.

I thought Bridgy was supposed to convert the syndicated copy of a post to their website link for that reason. Maybe I'm confused about that. @snarfed

@jaschaurbach
Copy link
Author

I jfound out that the parent comment is empty: 681444048580159\\/111681453109020359","comment_parent":"","comment_autho

@snarfed
Copy link
Contributor

snarfed commented Jan 5, 2024

I thought Bridgy was supposed to convert the syndicated copy of a post to their website link for that reason. Maybe I'm confused about that. @snarfed

Right. The root problem here, or at least one, is that https://brid.gy/comment/mastodon/@jascha@ohai.social/111681444048580159/111681453109020359 should have u-in-reply-to link pointing to https://jascha.wtf/angels-at-chaos-about-volunteering-and-fitting-in/ , but doesn't.

That post is both a direct reply to https://chaos.social/@jascha@ohai.social/111681444071267594 and an indirect reply to the root post https://chaos.social/@jascha@ohai.social/111679915834398325 . The original post https://jascha.wtf/angels-at-chaos-about-volunteering-and-fitting-in/ is in the latter. Bridgy should still find it, but my guess is that the immediate parent is overriding it somehow. Maybe related to snarfed/bridgy#1617 . I'll add these details there.

Thanks for the report, all!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants