-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 885
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Caller test failure on CITGM #1368
Comments
@mcollina I've put your ssh keys onto test-ibm-rhel8-x64-3. You should be able to log in as root@ip address from our inventory. The CI jobs, e.g. citgm, run as the I've also marked the system offline in Jenkins so there won't be interference from further CI runs. Please let me know when you're done with it so I can put it back. |
@richardlau @targos I have been trying to reproduce in that machine by running the test directly and I couldn't. The mistery keeps being there. How long can I keep the machine? |
@mcollina No rush for now, we have three other rhel8-x64 instances in use. |
@richardlau have you got any suggestion to debug this? I've tried several times and the suite is always passing. |
Have you tried running the test through citgm? Citgm also runs stuff in parallel -- perhaps the issue is sensitive to load? |
I did run
and the results came out green for pino. I'm now trying running the test standalone until tomorrow morning to see if it crashes. |
Best of luck! The citgm job does pass |
This is due to pinojs/pino-pretty#304 which might trigger under severe load and short-lived scripts. The fix on pino-pretty will happen on its own time but there is no need to use pino-pretty in these tests. Fixes #1368
I've opened a PR to fix this! You can reintegrate the instance back into the fold or leave it there until after we have released the new version of pino and tested on CITGM. |
This is due to pinojs/pino-pretty#304 which might trigger under severe load and short-lived scripts. The fix on pino-pretty will happen on its own time but there is no need to use pino-pretty in these tests. Fixes #1368
This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
Pino is failing on CITGM in RHEL and Ubuntu systems
https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js-citgm/job/citgm-smoker/2880/nodes=rhel8-s390x/testReport/junit/(root)/citgm/pino_v7_8_1/
https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js-citgm/job/citgm-smoker/2880/nodes=rhel8-x64/testReport/junit/(root)/citgm/pino_v7_8_1/
https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js-citgm/job/citgm-smoker/2880/nodes=ubuntu1804-64/testReport/junit/(root)/citgm/pino_v7_8_1/
However that test passes 100% of the time locally and on our CI. I think there is a bug lurking somewhere.
@mhdawson @targos could you replicate this problem on your machines (a
citgm pino
would do)? Do you think it would be possible to get access to one of those systems so that I can diagnose the problem?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: