Spelling #924
Open
Spelling #924
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This was developed using https://github.com/jsoref/piskel/tree/spell-check, you can see the runs here: https://github.com/jsoref/piskel/actions/
Historically, I'd run a private spell checking tool against a repository and then just contribute the fixes. And then a couple of years later, I'd come back and repeat the process. To the extent that I manage to get back to a project, that works. But the alternative is actually offering a tool that projects can use to catch errors in advance. If you're interested, I'm happy to make a PR w/ the GitHub action.
I'm still getting used to using this as an Action, especially the idea of telling it to ignore CSS colors -- which resulted in a bit of a goose chase trying to figure out where
sperandnvaswere coming from. In normal usage, when one tries to add a misspelling, the tool will annotate the new word and it's pretty obvious.