You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Rust's type system helps a lot with validation, given plenty of assumptions and requirements can be registered within the used types. At times however the combination of properties give meaning as a group, where some combinations make sense and others not. Enums (sum types) are what help usually in this situation. However it is not always a desired one, and in the case of venndb it doesn't play very well with the rest of the setup. As such for that reason and others it can be useful to allow for a custom validation of a row prior to appending it, such that one can guarantee that any appended rows do fulfill all required requirements.
Example:
#[derive(Debug,VennDB)]#[venndb(name = "MyDB", validatator = "my_validator_fn")]pubstructValue{pubfoo:String,pubbar:u32,}fnmy_validator_fn(value:&Value) -> bool{
!foo.is_empty() && value.bar > 0}letmut db = MyDB::default();assert!(db.append(Value{
foo: "".to_owned(),
bar: 42,
}).is_err());// fails because foo == empty
The above example illustrates that the type system can only bring you so far.
Of course one can argue that a NewType can solve this particular issue by only allowing the newtype
instances to be created with values that match such conditions. And this is true.
However, what if the legal value space of a column depends upon the specific value of another?
E.g. what is foo can be empty when bar is 2. This becomes a lot more difficult, and given the
large space that unsigned integers are composed from it might also become impossible
to abstract such rules in a sum type. If desired at all of course, given it would also make
the usage of it within a venndb-derived db more difficult.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Rust's type system helps a lot with validation, given plenty of assumptions and requirements can be registered within the used types. At times however the combination of properties give meaning as a group, where some combinations make sense and others not. Enums (sum types) are what help usually in this situation. However it is not always a desired one, and in the case of venndb it doesn't play very well with the rest of the setup. As such for that reason and others it can be useful to allow for a custom validation of a row prior to appending it, such that one can guarantee that any appended rows do fulfill all required requirements.
Example:
The above example illustrates that the type system can only bring you so far.
Of course one can argue that a NewType can solve this particular issue by only allowing the newtype
instances to be created with values that match such conditions. And this is true.
However, what if the legal value space of a column depends upon the specific value of another?
E.g. what is
foo
can be empty whenbar
is 2. This becomes a lot more difficult, and given thelarge space that unsigned integers are composed from it might also become impossible
to abstract such rules in a sum type. If desired at all of course, given it would also make
the usage of it within a venndb-derived db more difficult.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: