Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Respect localStorage.plausible_ignore #8

Closed
rbange opened this issue Feb 11, 2021 · 11 comments
Closed

Respect localStorage.plausible_ignore #8

rbange opened this issue Feb 11, 2021 · 11 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@rbange
Copy link

rbange commented Feb 11, 2021

It would be nice if this lib would support the opt out via local storage, as the js script does:
https://plausible.io/docs/excluding

Detailed Description

Context

Possible Implementation

Similar to the localhost disabling?

@rbange rbange added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 11, 2021
@cosminstefanxp
Copy link

I've noticed this was just fixed in develop. Any plans for releasing this soon?

@ukutaht
Copy link
Contributor

ukutaht commented Oct 15, 2021

I don't think I can publish this on NPM. @Maronato can you do it or transfer the package to me so I can do it?

@metmarkosaric
Copy link
Contributor

i believe i have the access, will send you a message

@abridger
Copy link

Hi folks, I just wondered if you had a rough estimate for when you might be able to release this? We'd really love to make use of it. Thanks!

@ukutaht
Copy link
Contributor

ukutaht commented Oct 26, 2021

Just published v0.3.2

@ledermann
Copy link

ledermann commented Oct 27, 2021

@ukutaht It seems to me that something went wrong with the release of v0.3.2. I installed the new package, but there is no localStorage handling in the code. The package on NPM seems to be an older or incomplete build:
https://diff.intrinsic.com/plausible-tracker/0.3.1/0.3.2

@rbange
Copy link
Author

rbange commented Oct 27, 2021

Can confirm that the feature is does not work in release 0.3.2 not sure why though

@ukutaht
Copy link
Contributor

ukutaht commented Oct 27, 2021

Whoops, forgot to build before publishing. Can you try 0.3.4?

@ledermann
Copy link

Thanks, 0.3.4 works fine 👍

@rbange
Copy link
Author

rbange commented Oct 27, 2021

Can confirm 👍

@rbange rbange closed this as completed Oct 27, 2021
@abridger
Copy link

Working nicely for us too. Thanks folks! 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants